Duty Bound Leftist

Well whats 22,000/750,000? That is roughly 2.93% which was the amount of risk Britain wagered to maintain power in to what is now the America, Latin, Central, North, South or otherwise. When all was said and done, they only just began to experience losses on their gamble did they want to surrender. If something impacts all peoples “society, counties, populations of peoples, symbolism of cultures and behaviors” in some way to understand a population and imperial data based on the very things that got us here. With math and compassion can you understand the pain of our human history.

Oh yeah, the argument for 3%. So every system has a cost whether through corruption, risk, and natural disasters. Mortality is a measure on society. Once it crosses certain points, either purposeful or through severe negligence. The outcomes are irresponsible, so how one participated isn’t really a point worth arguing about because it’s not the point. While I took the time to emphasize the %, its less about the number and how it compares to losses of systems, especially if it impacts systemic issues. If the logic is sound, I’m curious about two populations compares to all populations, followers of Q, and involvement in church. The thing to test in both those populations would be % of those abused against the whole population. The reason is really to have empathy for anyone, even if they spark rage in you.

First is the almost god given purpose and duty this gives to people feeling powerless. You give yourself agency when the games been stacked against you forever and you’re resentful. The purpose they claim is righteous. I don’t think what they’re claiming is going on, as far as sexual predatory, emotional, and physical abuses isn’t baseless. I would just like to present a an other hypothesis to the charges they bring. I put another for the blame; the Church. In the case of Spotlight* there was roughly 16.7% of priests who “molested children over several decades.” (NPR) I’ve tried to grasp what that means, not so much from an individual level, but of societal. Even if it was 6% of priests worldwide, the scale is still unimaginable. Instead I need to know outcomes from such a heinous act, from someone whom are trusted, who is a pillar in your community. The confusion those abusive monsters created for so many people. Outcomes from that starts from the broken people that systemic abuse emboldened would hardly be unique. Would those people be opposed to digging for the truth for they fear the truth within themselves? It is also not only the abuser and the abused who are effected from these society rotting crimes. All of society will bare that pain for it’s a failure of systems to protect against.

Food for thought at the end, I’ve got to really expand my knowledge and next Political post is going to happen after I understand how anti-Muslim sentiment empowered Nazi’s after WWI. That or I misunderstood it and it was something else entirely, we’ll find out together.

*(famous case uncovering the abuse of children from priests in Boston.)